Alternative drugs against multiresistant Gram-negative bacteria.

OBJECTIVES: Enterobacterales and other non-fermenting Gram-negative bacteria have become a threat worldwide owing to the frequency of multidrug resistance in these pathogens. On the other hand, efficacious therapeutic options are quickly diminishing. The aims of this study were to describe the susceptibility of 50 multiresistant Gram-negative bacteria, mostly pan-resistant, against old and less-used antimicrobial drugs and to investigate the presence of antimicrobial resistance genes. METHODS: A total of 50 genetically distinct isolates were included in this study, including 14 Acinetobacter baumannii (belonging to ST79, ST317, ST835 and ST836), 1 Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ST245), 8 Serratia marcescens and 27 Klebsiella pneumoniae (belonging to ST11, ST340, ST258, ST16, ST23, ST25, ST101, ST234, ST437 and ST442). The isolates were submitted to antimicrobial susceptibility testing and whole-genome sequencing to evaluate lineages and resistance genes. RESULTS: Our results showed that some strains harboured carbapenemase genes, e.g. blaKPC-2 (28/50; 56%) and blaOXA-23 (11/50; 22%), and other resistance genes encoding aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes (49/50; 98%). Susceptibility rates to tigecycline (96%) in all species (except P. aeruginosa), to minocycline (100%) and doxycycline (93%) in A. baumannii, to ceftazidime/avibactam in S. marcescens (100%) and K. pneumoniae (96%), and to fosfomycin in S. marcescens (88%) were high. Chloramphenicol and quinolones (6% susceptibility each) did not perform well, making their use in an empirical scenario unlikely. CONCLUSIONS: This study involving genetically distinct bacteria showed promising results for tigecycline for all Gram-negative bacteria (except P. aeruginosa), and there was good activity of minocycline against A. baumannii, ceftazidime/avibactam against Enterobacterales, and fosfomycin against S. marcescens.

POLYCLONAL OUTBREAK OF BLOODSTREAM INFECTIONS CAUSED BY Burkholderia cepacia COMPLEX IN HEMATOLOGY AND BONE MARROW TRANSPLANT OUTPATIENT UNITS / Surto policlonal de infecção de corrente sanguínea causada pelo complexo Burkholderia cepacia em unidades de hospital-dia de hematologia e transplante de medula óssea

Aim: The objective was to describe an outbreak of bloodstream infections by Burkholderia cepacia complex (Bcc) in bone marrow transplant and hematology outpatients. Methods: On February 15, 2008 a Bcc outbreak was suspected. 24 cases were identified. Demographic and clinical data were evaluated. Environment and healthcare workers' (HCW) hands were cultured. Species were determined and typed. Reinforcement of hand hygiene, central venous catheter (CVC) care, infusion therapy, and maintenance of laminar flow cabinet were undertaken. 16 different HCWs had cared for the CVCs. Multi-dose heparin and saline were prepared on counter common to both units. Findings: 14 patients had B. multivorans (one patient had also B. cenopacia), six non-multivorans Bcc and one did not belong to Bcc. Clone A B. multivorans occurred in 12 patients (from Hematology); in 10 their CVC had been used on February 11/12. Environmental and HCW cultures were negative. All patients were treated with meropenem, and ceftazidime lock-therapy. Eight patients (30%) were hospitalized. No deaths occurred. After control measures (multidose vial for single patient; CVC lock with ceftazidime; cleaning of laminar flow cabinet; hand hygiene improvement; use of cabinet to store prepared medication), no new cases occurred. Conclusions: This polyclonal outbreak may be explained by a common source containing multiple species of Bcc, maybe the laminar flow cabinet common to both units. There may have been contamination by B. multivorans (clone A) of multi-dose vials.

O objetivo foi descrever um surto de infecções da corrente sanguínea por complexo B. cepacia (Bcc) nos ambulatórios de hematologia e transplante de medula óssea. Métodos: Em 15/02/2008, um surto de Bcc foi suspeitado. 24 casos foram identificados. Os dados demográficos e clínicos foram avaliados. Mãos de profissionais da saúde e ambiente foram cultivadas. Espécies foram determinadas e tipadas. Reforço da higiene das mãos, cuidados com cateteres, terapia de infusão e manutenção da câmara de fluxo laminar foram realizadas. 16 profissionais de saúde (PS) diferentes manipularam os cateteres. Heparina multidoses e soro eram preparadas em um balcão comum a ambas as unidades. Resultados: 14 pacientes tiveram B. multivorans (um paciente teve também B. cenopacia), 6 Bcc não-multivorans e um teve um agente não pertencente a Bcc. Clone A de B. multivorans ocorreu em 12 pacientes (da Hematologia), em 10 o cateter havia sido utilizado nos dias 11 ou 12 de fevereiro. Culturas ambientais e de PS foram negativos. Todos os pacientes foram tratados com meropenem e selo de ceftazidima. Oito pacientes (30%) foram hospitalizados. Não ocorreram mortes. Após as medidas de controle, nenhum novo caso ocorreu. Conclusões: Este surto policlonal pode ser explicado por uma fonte comum contendo várias espécies de Bcc, talvez a câmara de fluxo laminar comum a ambas as unidades. Pode ter havido contaminação por B. multivorans (clone A) de frascos multi-dose.